Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study
Legal News
Judgements
Articles
Syllabus
Bare Acts
Exam Notifications
Legal NewsArticlesBare Acts
Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study

India's most comprehensive legal exam preparation platform. Prepare for Judiciary, UGC NET, AIBE, CLAT and more.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

Follow Us

Exams

  • Judiciary Exams
  • UGC NET Law
  • AIBE
  • CLAT / LLB Entrance
  • LLM Entrance
  • ADA / APP / APO

Resources

  • Legal News
  • Latest Judgements
  • Landmark Judgements
  • Legal Articles
  • Exam Notifications
  • Bare Acts
  • Syllabus

Company

  • About Lexpedia
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refund Policy

Partner with Us

Advertise with Lexpedia

Reach 1M+ law students across India

Share PYQs with Us

Help students succeed — upload papers

© 2026 Lexpedia. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTermsRefund
Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study
Legal News
Judgements
Articles
Syllabus
Bare Acts
Exam Notifications
Legal NewsArticlesBare Acts
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Punjab & Haryana High Court Seeks Status Report on Rajkumar Rao’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Behan Hogi Teri’ Poster

Punjab & Haryana High Court Seeks Status Report on Rajkumar Rao’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Behan Hogi Teri’ Poster

Lexpedia · 30 July 2025 · 2 min read

Punjab & Haryana High Court Seeks Status Report on Rajkumar Rao’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Behan Hogi Teri’ Poster
Share:

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has sought a status report from the Jalandhar Police in connection with a petition filed by Bollywood actor Rajkumar Rao seeking quashing of an FIR registered against him for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through a promotional poster of the 2017 film Behan Hogi Teri.

The FIR, lodged in Punjab’s Jalandhar, accuses Rao under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings), Section 120B IPC (criminal conspiracy), and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. The controversy stems from a promotional image circulated during the film’s release, in which Rajkumar Rao was shown dressed as Lord Shiva, sitting on a motorcycle. The petitioner contends that the portrayal was part of a scripted role in which his character, a member of a neighborhood devotional group (jagran mandali), often dressed up as Lord Shiva during community events. In a recent development, Rao surrendered before a Jalandhar Court and was granted bail in the case.

Court Seeks Response from Police

Hearing the petition, Justice N.S. Shekhawat of the Punjab & Haryana High Court issued notice in the matter and sought a status report from the police. The Court observed:  “Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 and prays for time to file a status report...The status report of investigation may be filed by way of an affidavit of Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar on or before the next date of hearing.” The matter has been adjourned to August 08.

The plea, filed by Advocate Tejeshwar Singh, argues that the essential ingredient of Section 295A IPC “deliberate and malicious intention” is absent in this case. It highlights that there is no evidence suggesting that Rao had any intention to outrage religious sentiments. The petitioner emphasized that he merely acted in accordance with a scripted role and that there is no conceivable motive for him to insult any religious belief or community.

Furthermore, the petition points out that the film Behan Hogi Teri was reviewed and certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) with a 'UA' certificate. Since the CBFC is a statutory authority under the Cinematograph Act, 1952, tasked with examining potentially offensive or religiously sensitive content, its clearance of the film indicates that the scenes in question are not legally objectionable. The plea also invokes Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, asserting that the portrayal in question is protected as artistic expression under the right to freedom of speech and expression.

Case Title: Rajkumar Yadav alias Raj Kumar Yadav alias Rajkumar Rao vs. State of Punjab and Another

Evidence ActFreedom of SpeechGuidelinesMotive Factories ActAnticipatory BailBail

Related Legal News

Delhi Court Grants Bail To ‘The Skin Doctor’ Arrested Over Social Media Post Against Priya Kapur

13 May 2026 · Lexpedia News

Kerala Court grants statutory bail to Smart Creations CEO & jeweller in Sabarimala gold theft case

21 March 2026 · Lexpedia News

Delhi High Court grants bail to two men accused of ISIS propaganda under UAPA after 4 years in jail

21 March 2026 · Lexpedia News

Punjab & Haryana High Court denies bail to YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra accused of spying for Pakistan

14 March 2026 · Lexpedia News

Latest Articles

MONTHLY MAGAZINE MARCH

Lexpedia News

MONTHLY MAGAZINE FEBRUARY

Lexpedia News

MONTHLY MAGAZINE JANUARY

Lexpedia

Preamble to the Constitution of India and the Constituent Assembly: Foundation of Indian Democracy

Lexpedia News

Digital Arrest: India’s Fastest-Growing Cybercrime and the Psychology of Fear

Lexpedia News

Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study

India's most comprehensive legal exam preparation platform. Prepare for Judiciary, UGC NET, AIBE, CLAT and more.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

Follow Us

Exams

  • Judiciary Exams
  • UGC NET Law
  • AIBE
  • CLAT / LLB Entrance
  • LLM Entrance
  • ADA / APP / APO

Resources

  • Legal News
  • Latest Judgements
  • Landmark Judgements
  • Legal Articles
  • Exam Notifications
  • Bare Acts
  • Syllabus

Company

  • About Lexpedia
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refund Policy

Partner with Us

Advertise with Lexpedia

Reach 1M+ law students across India

Share PYQs with Us

Help students succeed — upload papers

© 2026 Lexpedia. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTermsRefund